<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Time Is Tight &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timeistight.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timeistight.com</link>
	<description>It&#039;s a large world, Adrienne.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Same-Sex Marriage Law Passed</title>
		<link>http://www.timeistight.com/2005/06/29/same-sex-marriage-law-passed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeistight.com/2005/06/29/same-sex-marriage-law-passed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeistight.com/2005/06/29/same-sex-marriage-law-passed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good for us!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050628.wssex0628/BNStory/Front/">Good for us</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeistight.com/2005/06/29/same-sex-marriage-law-passed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biz-Lingo: A French Primer</title>
		<link>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/12/02/biz-lingo-a-french-primer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/12/02/biz-lingo-a-french-primer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 01:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeistight.com/2004/12/02/biz-lingo-a-french-primer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might need some of these some day, god help me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might need some of <a href="http://www.optimuscrime.com/2004/11/hey-quick-can-you-help-me-envisioneer.html">these</a> some day, god help me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/12/02/biz-lingo-a-french-primer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Separated At Birth?</title>
		<link>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/09/14/separated-at-birth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/09/14/separated-at-birth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeistight.com/2004/09/13/separated-at-birth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d never noticed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hundreddollarguitar.com/2004/09/03/index.html#longchin">I&#8217;d never noticed.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/09/14/separated-at-birth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Marriage II</title>
		<link>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/03/03/gay-marriage-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/03/03/gay-marriage-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gays want to marry precisely because they see marriage as important: they want the symbolism that marriage brings, the extra sense of obligation and commitment, as well as the social recognition. Allowing gays to marry would, if anything, add to &#8230; <a href="http://www.timeistight.com/2004/03/03/gay-marriage-ii/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?Story_ID=2459758"><img src="http://www.economist.com/images/20040228/20040228issuecov.jpg" alt="Economist, February 28, 2004" /><br />
Gays want to marry precisely because they see marriage as important: they want the symbolism that marriage brings, the extra sense of obligation and commitment, as well as the social recognition. Allowing gays to marry would, if anything, add to social stability, for it would increase the number of couples that take on real, rather than simply passing, commitments. The weakening of marriage has been heterosexuals&#8217; doing, not gays&#8217;, for it is their infidelity, divorce rates and single-parent families that have wrought social damage.</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="aside"><a href="http://www.timeistight.com/politics/gaymarriage.html">More</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/03/03/gay-marriage-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.timeistight.com/2003/08/19/gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeistight.com/2003/08/19/gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2003 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until now I&#8217;ve avoided politics here, but I can&#8217;t keep silent about this. Gay marriage will be good for gays, good for society and good for the institution of marriage. Some kind of newly-minted &#8220;domestic partnership,&#8221; on the other hand, &#8230; <a href="http://www.timeistight.com/2003/08/19/gay-marriage/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until now I&#8217;ve avoided politics here, but I can&#8217;t keep silent about this.  Gay marriage will be good for gays, good for society and good for the  institution  of marriage. Some kind of newly-minted &#8220;domestic partnership,&#8221; on the other  hand, won&#8217;t satisfy those gays who wish to  partake in the institution and  ritual of marriage, will divide Canadian society and will blur and diminish  the institution of marriage. Besides which, unless the government ends all  state involvement in marriage, the &quot;domestic partnership&quot; finagle won&#8217;t satisfy  the  charter challenges that brought this issue to the fore in the first place.</p>
<p>I believe marriage is a right of all adult Canadians. I won&#8217;t vote for any  politician who opposes that right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeistight.com/2003/08/19/gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

