<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Time Is Tight &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timeistight.com/category/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timeistight.com</link>
	<description>It&#039;s a large world, Adrienne.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:53:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Finally, A Band That Will Have Me</title>
		<link>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/01/06/finally-a-band-that-will-have-me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/01/06/finally-a-band-that-will-have-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2004 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s new GarageBand looks incredibly cool; I&#8217;m definitely going to pick up iLife 4.0 as soon as I can. It does make we wonder if it was a mistake to buy SoundTrack, though.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s new <a href="http://www.apple.com/ilife/garageband/">GarageBand</a> looks incredibly cool; I&#8217;m definitely going to pick up iLife  4.0 as soon as I can.</p>
<p>It does make we wonder if it was a mistake to buy <a href="http://www.apple.com/soundtrack/">SoundTrack</a>, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeistight.com/2004/01/06/finally-a-band-that-will-have-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bumpy Road to OS X</title>
		<link>http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/17/bumpy-road-to-os-x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/17/bumpy-road-to-os-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeffrey Zeldman points to a discussion at MacCentral forum as justifying Apple&#8217;s decision to extend the life of OS 9 &#34;a bit longer&#34;. As I read the discussion, these people have no intention of ever switching to OS X, Quark &#8230; <a href="http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/17/bumpy-road-to-os-x/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.zeldman.com/daily/1202b.shtml#glam76">Jeffrey Zeldman</a> points to a <a href="http://forums.maccentral.com/wwwthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&#38;Board=news021213bootphp&#38;Number=342054&#38;page=&#38;view=expanded&#38;sb=5&#38;o=&#38;part=&#38;returnto=http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0212/13.boot.php">discussion</a>  at MacCentral forum as justifying Apple&#8217;s decision to extend the life of OS 9 &quot;a bit longer&quot;. As I read the discussion, these people have no intention of ever switching to OS X, Quark or no Quark.</p>
<p><a href="http://daringfireball.net/2002/12/finder_reflux.html">Elsewhere</a>, John Gruber wants Apple to replace the OS X finder with one that &quot;builds on&quot; the one in OS 9:</p>
<blockquote><p>So imagine if the OS X Finder were redesigned to appeal to Mac OS 9 users. By simply changing nothing other than the Finder, the entire &#8220;Mac OS X&#8221; experience would instantly feel much more familiar to millions of Mac users.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, it would instantly feel more foreign to switchers like me who&#8217;ve never used the &#8220;classic&#8221; OS. It&#8217;s becoming apparent that many Mac lovers will never willingly switch to OS X. They don&#8217;t like the Finder, the dock, the icons or the muli-user underpining. I suppose Apple can continue shipping OS 9.2 for years but I think pressure for revisions to the old system would begin to build. Even Microsoft couldn&#8217;t justify development on two separate operating systems forever; Apple can&#8217;t afford it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/17/bumpy-road-to-os-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reports of Its Death have Been Exaggerated</title>
		<link>http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/15/reports-of-its-death-have-been-exaggerated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/15/reports-of-its-death-have-been-exaggerated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2002 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has evidently backed down from its plan to have all its systems boot only OS X come January (via [lomo]blog). &#8220;To accommodate a minority of our pro customers still running Mac OS 9 applications such as QuarkXPress, Apple will &#8230; <a href="http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/15/reports-of-its-death-have-been-exaggerated/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has evidently <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1040-977881.html">backed down</a> from its plan to have all its systems boot only OS X come January (via <a href="http://lomoblog.com/2.0/index.php?entry=/mac/os9/imnotdeadyet.txt">[lomo]blog</a>).</p>
<p>&#8220;To accommodate a minority of our pro customers still running Mac OS 9 applications such as QuarkXPress, Apple will continue to offer a 1.25GHz dual-processor Power Mac that will boot into Mac OS 9 until June,&#8221; Apple said in a statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/15/reports-of-its-death-have-been-exaggerated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Oh, and I got an iPod. It&#8217;s like the coolest thing ever.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/11/oh-and-i-got-an-ipod-its-like-the-coolest-thing-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/11/oh-and-i-got-an-ipod-its-like-the-coolest-thing-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">//?p=</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know how I missed this (it might have been grand-parenthood), but on November 22, the truth was finally revealed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how I missed this (it might have been grand-parenthood), but on November 22, the <a href="http://www.browndailyherald.com/post/stories.asp?ID=269">truth</a> was finally revealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeistight.com/2002/12/11/oh-and-i-got-an-ipod-its-like-the-coolest-thing-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

